A FORMER retained firefighter from Wales who failed to maintain a fire alarm in a care home has been fined £11,000 including costs in a landmark case.
Christopher Morris, 56, of Llandudno, Wales, appeared before Manchester Crown Court for sentencing after pleading guilty to two separate offences at Trafford Magistrates Court.
He was fined £2,500 for each offence and £6,000 in costs for failing to maintain a fire alarm system at a care home in Trafford, Manchester, to a recognised standard and failing to inform the owners of the home of the deficiencies in the system.
Morris is the first fire alarm engineer to be prosecuted as a responsible person under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO). At the previous hearing the bench at Trafford Magistrates Court decided it did not have sufficient powers to deal with the case and what they described as 'culpable neglect' by the defendant.
The case was brought to court by Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority in what is believed to be the first of its kind under the FSO. The law allows the Fire and Rescue Authority to prosecute a person who has responsibility for a particular area of premises or, as in this case, maintaining fire equipment that requires specialist knowledge or skills to carry out repairs.
Deputy County Fire Officer Jim Owen said it would send a strong message throughout the fire industry that Fire and Rescue Authorities in England and Wales will not hesitate in taking firm action against anyone that falls short of their obligations under fire legislation.
Mr Owen said: "Whilst many owners have been prosecuted under the Fire Safety Order, this may be the first time a fire and rescue authority has prosecuted someone contracted by the owner of a property to maintain a fire alarm. Taking on such a contract extends the requirements of the order to the fire alarm engineer. Anyone we find who doesn't carry out their work to recognised standards is a danger and we won't hesitate to take action."
The court heard how Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service attended a fire incident at a care home in Trafford in May 2009. An elderly resident died following the blaze. During subsequent investigations into the fire safety arrangements at the premises, fire safety enforcement officers commissioned an examination of the fire alarm system by a specialist consultant who sits on the British Standard committee for fire alarm systems.
The examination report revealed that the system was estimated to have been installed during the late 1980s or early 1990s and that a number of issues were discovered within the panel that demonstrated poor practice remedial work had been carried out at some time during its lifetime. This included:
A blown fuse over-ridden with a piece of wireAn electronic component had been suspended between two terminal bocks instead of being attached to the circuit board, an alarm silence/fault warning buzzer was missing from the circuit board and the fault warning light on the front face of the panel had been almost covered by paint
Christopher Morris, an electrician who had taken over the maintenance of the system in 2006, had issued several annual certificates of worthiness to the owner of the home, stating the system was 100 per cent.
During an interview under caution, Morris initially claimed that although the system was old it complied with the relevant British Standard. However, when he was challenged about the poor repair issues and shown the specialists photographs he admitted that he was not aware of them.
If anything, surely the above is a good case for a premises Responsible Person contracting to BAFE/third party accredited companies?
Friday 24 December 2010
Wednesday 22 December 2010
IFEDA dry riser courses
The advertised january course and the February follow-up are now full. the next two day dry riser course is scheduled for May. Please contact for details.
Faulty Xmas lights
Frightening how quick this tree and the room go up in flames
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtjGfr0tYs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtjGfr0tYs
FSO breach: marina store fined
The Hartlepool Mail reports that:-
A DISCOUNT store chain has been hit with a fine after a fire service found emergency exits were blocked during a blaze in one of its shops.
Opus Homewares has been slapped with a £7,500 fine and ordered to pay £4,000 in court costs after a fire in the firm's B&M Home Store, in Highlight Retail Park, Hartlepool, on September 30, 2009. Fire safety officers found bosses had breached regulations five times by blocking exits and took the company to court last week. Cleveland Fire Brigade is now warning other businesses to make sure their premises are up to standard, both to keep people safe and avoid hefty fines. Simon Arora, managing director of Opus Homewares, said his company regrets the incident and has since worked closely with the fire service to make the store safe. Barry Waller, head of fire engineering for Cleveland Fire Brigade, said: "The fire broke out at the front of the store and, after the fire was extinguished by responding fire crews, it was found that several exits were unavailable or obstructed. "The circumstances found at the time of the incident were such that they seriously compromised the safety of the occupants and that is not something the fire brigade can, or will, condone."It is important people realise we take these regulations very seriously and we will take such action whenever necessary."The company was in Hartlepool Magistrates' Court last week for the five offences under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. Ian Hayton, chief fire officer for Cleveland Fire Brigade, said: "I would also like to take this opportunity to remind people that the role of the fire service in relation to fire safety has changed to that of enforcement and that it is the responsibility of owners, occupiers or managers to ensure that suitable and sufficient fire safety arrangements are in place within their premises."
Thursday 9 December 2010
Announcing a New 2 Day Course from IFEDA
The Service & Maintenance of Dry Risers with regards to BS9990 : 2006
There will be a 2 day course on the Service and Maintenance of Dry Risers at our Stockport Training Centre on 18th and 19th January 2011
The objective of the IFEDA training course for the Service & Maintenance of Dry Riser Systems (also known as a Dry Fire Main) is to give competent Service Technicians guidance, together with a more thorough understanding of their responsibilities when carrying out work on these systems.
The course will include hands-on practical sessions on our purpose-built dry riser stack and a theory examination with regards to BS9990: 2006 and the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
Members cost £305 (ex VAT)
Non-members cost £355 (ex VAT)
Price includes manual, certificate (for the successful candidate), lunch and refreshments, but excludes travel and accommodation costs.
To book please contact Karen on info@ifeda.org
SYLLABUS
British Standard 9990: 2006.
An introduction to the current “Code of practice for non-automatic fire-fighting systems in buildings” covering the design, installation, testing and maintenance of dry fire-fighting mains, including a brief description of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, and the duties of the “Responsible Person” in respect of Dry Riser provision and maintenance.
Health & Safety at Work
Duties and responsibilities of the employer and the employee particularly in respect of site service visits.
Dry Riser, Components and Parts
The purpose of Dry Risers their operating principles and an introduction to the valves and inlets/outlets associated with a Dry Riser System.
Testing, Servicing and Maintenance of Dry Risers
The outlined procedures for Service/Maintenance Engineers to carry out during the testing and servicing of Dry Risers. Fault identification and rectification: to include practical hands on instruction on our purpose-built dry riser stack
Monday 22 November 2010
The IFEDA/BFC Golf Challenge 2011
IFEDA and BFC members are looking forward to another weekend of friendly rivallry and sporting endeavour with the next Golf Challenge. The event will take place on the weekend of March 25th - March 27th and details of this popular event can be found by clicking here.
The Ashbury Hotel, Okehampton Nr Dartmoor, is not just for golf, as detailed via the welink, there are loads of outdoor and indoor activities for non-golfers including children and at great value: so why not make a family weekend of it?
To see all the activites at Ashbury click here
The Ashbury Hotel, Okehampton Nr Dartmoor, is not just for golf, as detailed via the welink, there are loads of outdoor and indoor activities for non-golfers including children and at great value: so why not make a family weekend of it?
To see all the activites at Ashbury click here
Saturday 20 November 2010
Minister 'talks out' Torbay MP's Bill home for smoke alarms
The Herald Express of South Devon reports the following:-
PLANS to make it a legal requirement for smoke alarms to be fitted in rented properties have been blocked by the Government.
Lib Dem MP for Torbay Adrian Sanders (pictured), who was seeking to introduce the new law, has expressed his disappointment after it was "talked out" by a minister.
It means the proposals effectively go to the bottom of the pile, and have virtually no chance of coming back because of lack of parliamentary time.
But Mr Sanders has vowed to continue fighting for the measure, and is seeking a meeting with ministers to overcome their concerns.
Mr Sanders said: "It's terribly disappointing the Government have taken this hardline regulatory line which is an ideological position, which just doesn't work when you talk about people's lives.
"Sometimes it's needed to protect the vulnerable."
Mr Sander's efforts follow the deaths of Stephanie Wojak and Ben McAuliffe in the Ellacombe blaze in 2009.
The house in Ellacombe Church Road where the children lived with Gill and Mike Wojak and their son Ricky did not have a fire alarm.
Following the tragedy it was revealed that 25 per cent of the Riviera Housing Trust homes, 690 properties, did not have fire alarms at the time.
It had planned to install smoke detectors in the remaining 25 per cent of its properties as part of a major home improvement programme, which it brought forward immediately.
Mr Sanders wants to ensure that there are working "hard-wired" fire safety devices in all rented properties at the start of a tenancy.
This would be alongside the existing legal requirements for gas and electricity checks, and an energy performance certificate.
The backbencher, who is a long-time campaigner for smoke alarms, suggested instead of creating new regulations, the EPC could be downgraded to a guideline, and the other requirements could be bundled into one and so actually reducing red-tape.
Mr Sanders told MPs that the plan, which had the backing of Devon fire chiefs, would save dozens of lives and prevent thousands of injuries every year. Speaking at the Bill's second reading debate, Mr Sanders warned the Government: "The bottom line here is that regulations save lives, ideological objections take lives.
"It's an interesting test for the coalition because that divide goes to the heart of what divides most Liberal Democrats from most Conservatives. Is the minister big enough to bridge that divide?"
His Bill was supported by Tory MP for Totnes Dr Sarah Wollaston and Shadow housing minister Alison Seabeck.
PLANS to make it a legal requirement for smoke alarms to be fitted in rented properties have been blocked by the Government.
Lib Dem MP for Torbay Adrian Sanders (pictured), who was seeking to introduce the new law, has expressed his disappointment after it was "talked out" by a minister.
It means the proposals effectively go to the bottom of the pile, and have virtually no chance of coming back because of lack of parliamentary time.
But Mr Sanders has vowed to continue fighting for the measure, and is seeking a meeting with ministers to overcome their concerns.
Mr Sanders said: "It's terribly disappointing the Government have taken this hardline regulatory line which is an ideological position, which just doesn't work when you talk about people's lives.
"Sometimes it's needed to protect the vulnerable."
Mr Sander's efforts follow the deaths of Stephanie Wojak and Ben McAuliffe in the Ellacombe blaze in 2009.
The house in Ellacombe Church Road where the children lived with Gill and Mike Wojak and their son Ricky did not have a fire alarm.
Following the tragedy it was revealed that 25 per cent of the Riviera Housing Trust homes, 690 properties, did not have fire alarms at the time.
It had planned to install smoke detectors in the remaining 25 per cent of its properties as part of a major home improvement programme, which it brought forward immediately.
Mr Sanders wants to ensure that there are working "hard-wired" fire safety devices in all rented properties at the start of a tenancy.
This would be alongside the existing legal requirements for gas and electricity checks, and an energy performance certificate.
The backbencher, who is a long-time campaigner for smoke alarms, suggested instead of creating new regulations, the EPC could be downgraded to a guideline, and the other requirements could be bundled into one and so actually reducing red-tape.
Mr Sanders told MPs that the plan, which had the backing of Devon fire chiefs, would save dozens of lives and prevent thousands of injuries every year. Speaking at the Bill's second reading debate, Mr Sanders warned the Government: "The bottom line here is that regulations save lives, ideological objections take lives.
"It's an interesting test for the coalition because that divide goes to the heart of what divides most Liberal Democrats from most Conservatives. Is the minister big enough to bridge that divide?"
His Bill was supported by Tory MP for Totnes Dr Sarah Wollaston and Shadow housing minister Alison Seabeck.
Monday 15 November 2010
Fire Safety order : Car Boot Organizer Fined.
The following case is a good example of The Fire Safety Order applying to NOT just shops, offices, guest houses etc but to one-off and short-term events such as a car boot sale.
THE organizer of a Mansfield car boot fair who breached fire safety regulations has had a £24,000 fine halved on appeal.
Michael John Snow received the fine at Nottingham Crown Court in July, along with a six-month suspended sentence. He was also ordered to do unpaid work.
He admitted eight breaches of fire safety regulations, including blocked fire exits, after holding a car boot sale on four floors of an indoor market at Botany Commercial Park, in Mansfield.
Snow, 54, of Derwent Crescent, Newbold, Chesterfield, had the fine halved to £12,000 at London's Appeal Court yesterday.
Mr Justice Henriques ruled Snow deserved credit for having been "candid" about the breaches.
However, a £9,000 legal costs order against him will remain in place.
THE organizer of a Mansfield car boot fair who breached fire safety regulations has had a £24,000 fine halved on appeal.
Michael John Snow received the fine at Nottingham Crown Court in July, along with a six-month suspended sentence. He was also ordered to do unpaid work.
He admitted eight breaches of fire safety regulations, including blocked fire exits, after holding a car boot sale on four floors of an indoor market at Botany Commercial Park, in Mansfield.
Snow, 54, of Derwent Crescent, Newbold, Chesterfield, had the fine halved to £12,000 at London's Appeal Court yesterday.
Mr Justice Henriques ruled Snow deserved credit for having been "candid" about the breaches.
However, a £9,000 legal costs order against him will remain in place.
Thursday 11 November 2010
Request from the BAFE team
Request from BAFE - could all BAFE members please check their details on the new BAFE website and that the search facility works for their details/postcode. Any problems please contact BAFE.
Wednesday 10 November 2010
Poundstretcher fined £50,000 over fire safety breaches
Nov 10 2010
A HUDDERSFIELD firm has been fined more than £50,000 for serious safety breaches.
Poundstretcher was hauled before a court after safety officials’ uncovered major problems at a store in Castleford.
Only one out of six fire exits could be used in the shop, Leeds Crown Court was told.
The consequences of a fire at the Poundstretcher shop could have been “frankly appalling” said Judge Jonathan Rose. He said the store on Carlton Street would have been a “death trap”.
The firm, based at the Trident Business Park in Leeds Road, Deighton, was fined a total of £51,500 with £3,449 costs for seven breaches of the Fire Safety Order 2005.
The court was told Poundstretcher had failed in its duty to make its store safe, had failed to ensure that exits were clear of obstructions, had not given staff adequate fire training and had not reviewed its fire risk assessment regularly.
Judge Rose said he had taken into account the fact that the company had not made a profit since 2005. But this did not absolve them of the duty to meet fire safety regulations.
The firm has previously been fined for similar concerns at its Halifax and Wakefield stores.
Toni Wharton, prosecuting, said that combustible material was stored en route to one fire exit and trolleys blocked another.
Store manager Ian Burn, who had been in post only two months, had not been given fire training and discovered fire exits only by trial and error, said Mrs Wharton. He didn't even know one of them existed.
Tahir Khan, for Poundstretcher, said the cluster of safety offences in 2009 did not represent the company's normal behaviour.
The sentence was welcomed by West Yorkshire fire chiefs.
Asst Chief Fire Officer Craig McIntosh, director of Fire Safety, said: “The charges brought against Poundstretcher for breaches of fire safety legislation follow similar offences at other Poundstretcher locations.
“This is the third time a prosecution has been brought in West Yorkshire.
“The severity of the fines imposed by the court show that companies cannot continue to treat public and staff safety with contempt. The fines are intended to make Poundstretcher take its obligations seriously in the future”.
A HUDDERSFIELD firm has been fined more than £50,000 for serious safety breaches.
Poundstretcher was hauled before a court after safety officials’ uncovered major problems at a store in Castleford.
Only one out of six fire exits could be used in the shop, Leeds Crown Court was told.
The consequences of a fire at the Poundstretcher shop could have been “frankly appalling” said Judge Jonathan Rose. He said the store on Carlton Street would have been a “death trap”.
The firm, based at the Trident Business Park in Leeds Road, Deighton, was fined a total of £51,500 with £3,449 costs for seven breaches of the Fire Safety Order 2005.
The court was told Poundstretcher had failed in its duty to make its store safe, had failed to ensure that exits were clear of obstructions, had not given staff adequate fire training and had not reviewed its fire risk assessment regularly.
Judge Rose said he had taken into account the fact that the company had not made a profit since 2005. But this did not absolve them of the duty to meet fire safety regulations.
The firm has previously been fined for similar concerns at its Halifax and Wakefield stores.
Toni Wharton, prosecuting, said that combustible material was stored en route to one fire exit and trolleys blocked another.
Store manager Ian Burn, who had been in post only two months, had not been given fire training and discovered fire exits only by trial and error, said Mrs Wharton. He didn't even know one of them existed.
Tahir Khan, for Poundstretcher, said the cluster of safety offences in 2009 did not represent the company's normal behaviour.
The sentence was welcomed by West Yorkshire fire chiefs.
Asst Chief Fire Officer Craig McIntosh, director of Fire Safety, said: “The charges brought against Poundstretcher for breaches of fire safety legislation follow similar offences at other Poundstretcher locations.
“This is the third time a prosecution has been brought in West Yorkshire.
“The severity of the fines imposed by the court show that companies cannot continue to treat public and staff safety with contempt. The fines are intended to make Poundstretcher take its obligations seriously in the future”.
Monday 8 November 2010
IFEDA : National Conference adopts Code of Conduct
IFEDA National Conference adopts new code of conduct
A new Code of Conduct was launched to universal approval at the recent IFEDA AGM and National Conference. This rounded off the year for the association, which passed its latest ISO 9001:2008 inspection just weeks before. The year saw rising membership numbers and IFEDA continued to represent its members at national level as well as receiving plaudits for the depth of knowledge and expertise of their trainers.
Held at Telford Hotel & Golf Resort, IFEDA invited a range of excellent speakers to bring their industry expertise to a number of thought provoking and important topics. Graham Newman, Secretary to the CEN/TC 70/WG5 committee which wrote and published EN3 the standard for portable fire extinguishers, instigated some lively discussions, whilst an interactive presentation by David Melton of Firetrace ensured that no-one had a quiet post lunch snooze. Ian Gough gave a timely demonstration on the vital importance of sprinkler systems and finishing off the day was Simon Ince of Warrington Certification. Simon spoke on the industry's need to make sure that Fire Risk Assessors are properly trained and accredited – a topic very much in tune with the ethos of IFEDA and supported by those present.
All members commit to raising standards within the industry by passing ISO 9001: 2008, in addition to the relevant BAFE scheme for their area of operation. This year's AGM and National Conference saw that as well as offering the reassurance of a respected and professional trade body, membership of IFEDA provides small businesses with a personal level of support and encouragement that will help their businesses reach their full potential.
Chairman Colin Payne said: “The atmosphere at this year's event was really buzzing. It's been a great year at IFEDA with a year on year increase in members and the adoption of the new Code of Conduct. We had an excellent turnout and members enjoyed the opportunity to network and catch up with fellow professionals from across the United Kingdom. Due to the excellent location of the event many members brought partners and children, bringing a real family feel to the weekend.
After our hard work throughout the year it was great to hear all who attended declaring the weekend a great success. It was very much a celebration of the commitment and dedication of the organisation and its members to raising quality standards across the fire industry, and as such launched us into what I am sure will be an exciting and challenging 2011.”
A new Code of Conduct was launched to universal approval at the recent IFEDA AGM and National Conference. This rounded off the year for the association, which passed its latest ISO 9001:2008 inspection just weeks before. The year saw rising membership numbers and IFEDA continued to represent its members at national level as well as receiving plaudits for the depth of knowledge and expertise of their trainers.
Held at Telford Hotel & Golf Resort, IFEDA invited a range of excellent speakers to bring their industry expertise to a number of thought provoking and important topics. Graham Newman, Secretary to the CEN/TC 70/WG5 committee which wrote and published EN3 the standard for portable fire extinguishers, instigated some lively discussions, whilst an interactive presentation by David Melton of Firetrace ensured that no-one had a quiet post lunch snooze. Ian Gough gave a timely demonstration on the vital importance of sprinkler systems and finishing off the day was Simon Ince of Warrington Certification. Simon spoke on the industry's need to make sure that Fire Risk Assessors are properly trained and accredited – a topic very much in tune with the ethos of IFEDA and supported by those present.
All members commit to raising standards within the industry by passing ISO 9001: 2008, in addition to the relevant BAFE scheme for their area of operation. This year's AGM and National Conference saw that as well as offering the reassurance of a respected and professional trade body, membership of IFEDA provides small businesses with a personal level of support and encouragement that will help their businesses reach their full potential.
Chairman Colin Payne said: “The atmosphere at this year's event was really buzzing. It's been a great year at IFEDA with a year on year increase in members and the adoption of the new Code of Conduct. We had an excellent turnout and members enjoyed the opportunity to network and catch up with fellow professionals from across the United Kingdom. Due to the excellent location of the event many members brought partners and children, bringing a real family feel to the weekend.
After our hard work throughout the year it was great to hear all who attended declaring the weekend a great success. It was very much a celebration of the commitment and dedication of the organisation and its members to raising quality standards across the fire industry, and as such launched us into what I am sure will be an exciting and challenging 2011.”
Wednesday 3 November 2010
Fire Hose Reel Course
Please note there will be an extra one day fire hose reel course at our Stockport premises on Friday 17th December - the syllabus will be as per BS671-3 : 2009. Mopre information can be found via www.ifeda.org/training.htm to book please email us.
Thanks Graham
Thanks Graham
Friday 29 October 2010
Firex North - And the winner is!
Robert Kearney of UBM was delighted to provide IFEDA with some independent adjudication for the 'win a fire extinguisher training course' draw at our exhibition stand.
Robert (on the left) picked out the business card of Communications Maintenance Services from Adlington, Chorley, Lancs.
Congratulations CMS - we hope you enjoy the course.
Thursday 21 October 2010
Win a BAFE recognised fire extinguisher training course
IFEDA will be at FIREX North exhibition on 27th & 28th October, Stand A33.
Do make sure you come along and say hello. Not only will you find out what IFEDA can do for your business but if you leave your business card with us you will have the chance of winning one of our industry recognised initial 3 day training courses for fire extinguisher technicians at either of our Stockport or Fareham training centres - worth £640.
For course information please see www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Do make sure you come along and say hello. Not only will you find out what IFEDA can do for your business but if you leave your business card with us you will have the chance of winning one of our industry recognised initial 3 day training courses for fire extinguisher technicians at either of our Stockport or Fareham training centres - worth £640.
For course information please see www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Wednesday 20 October 2010
London Fire Brigade : Industrial action imminent
Following isa letter to London based trade associations, businesses and service providers.
Dear Sir/Madam,
DISRUPTION OF SERVICE DUE TO INDUSTRIAL ACTION
I refer to my letter dated 28 September 2010 that advised of potential disruption to the Authority’s services. This letter is to confirm that industrial action will go ahead and the Fire Brigade’s Union has advised that the first proposed dates for action are 23 October and 1 November 2010. Any further proposed dates for industrial action will be reported in the press.
We will put in place alternative arrangements to ensure an emergency attendance in response to 999 calls although there may be a delayed attendance. We will not however be able to take calls from alarm receiving centres on the normal numbers and in the event of a fire alarm, you are advised to contact the Brigade on the 999 emergency number so that an attendance may be mobilised to the premises concerned.
During the period of industrial action there are a number of things you can do to reduce calls to the fire service and the risk of fire occurring which are outlined below. Taking these measures will also ensure you are protecting your business and staff.
If your fire alarm operates during any period of industrial action please react as follows:
Immediately the fire alarm sounds, put into action your normal evacuation routine.
Unless it is obvious that there is a fire, investigate the source of the alarm to establish if it is a fire or a false alarm.
If you are certain that there is no fire and no suspicion of a fire then the building should be reoccupied. Under these circumstances, do not call the fire brigade. If, during the investigation, a fire is discovered or there is a smell of burning or smoke that cannot be accounted for then dial 999 and ask for the fire brigade.
To prevent any unnecessary disruption, please ensure that any known problems resulting in false fire alarms are corrected so that there is a high degree of confidence that fire alarms that do occur are genuine.
If you have lifts in your building you should ensure that, in the event of a lift becoming stuck, clear advice is available on how to contact the responsible maintenance company. Details should be made available in the lift and where alarm calls are received in the building.
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 places a legal requirement upon employers and persons with responsibility for premises. These responsibilities and safety measures are designed to protect life regardless of fire service intervention. It is, therefore, essential to ensure that all existing fire safety provisions are in place and effective. Directors, Senior Managers and Health & Safety Managers will want to ensure the following are being considered:
Check business continuity plans;
Check the effectiveness of existing fire precautions;
Check staff are fully aware of fire and evacuation procedures;
Take appropriate steps to enhance staff vigilance;
Review arrangements for calling the emergency services;
The need for additional staffing or patrols.
During the period of industrial action it should be noted that we may not be able to respond to any fire safety enquiries within our normal time-scales. I would, however, highlight the fact that it remains the responsibility of employers and other premises occupiers to comply with fire safety law; information on how to achieve this, and more general fire safety advice, is available on our website at:
www.london-fire.gov.uk
I apologise for any inconvenience this temporary disruption may cause and can assure you that we will be taking all necessary action to minimise its effects.
Yours faithfully,
STEVE TUREK
Assistant Commissioner
Fire Safety Regulation
Dear Sir/Madam,
DISRUPTION OF SERVICE DUE TO INDUSTRIAL ACTION
I refer to my letter dated 28 September 2010 that advised of potential disruption to the Authority’s services. This letter is to confirm that industrial action will go ahead and the Fire Brigade’s Union has advised that the first proposed dates for action are 23 October and 1 November 2010. Any further proposed dates for industrial action will be reported in the press.
We will put in place alternative arrangements to ensure an emergency attendance in response to 999 calls although there may be a delayed attendance. We will not however be able to take calls from alarm receiving centres on the normal numbers and in the event of a fire alarm, you are advised to contact the Brigade on the 999 emergency number so that an attendance may be mobilised to the premises concerned.
During the period of industrial action there are a number of things you can do to reduce calls to the fire service and the risk of fire occurring which are outlined below. Taking these measures will also ensure you are protecting your business and staff.
If your fire alarm operates during any period of industrial action please react as follows:
Immediately the fire alarm sounds, put into action your normal evacuation routine.
Unless it is obvious that there is a fire, investigate the source of the alarm to establish if it is a fire or a false alarm.
If you are certain that there is no fire and no suspicion of a fire then the building should be reoccupied. Under these circumstances, do not call the fire brigade. If, during the investigation, a fire is discovered or there is a smell of burning or smoke that cannot be accounted for then dial 999 and ask for the fire brigade.
To prevent any unnecessary disruption, please ensure that any known problems resulting in false fire alarms are corrected so that there is a high degree of confidence that fire alarms that do occur are genuine.
If you have lifts in your building you should ensure that, in the event of a lift becoming stuck, clear advice is available on how to contact the responsible maintenance company. Details should be made available in the lift and where alarm calls are received in the building.
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 places a legal requirement upon employers and persons with responsibility for premises. These responsibilities and safety measures are designed to protect life regardless of fire service intervention. It is, therefore, essential to ensure that all existing fire safety provisions are in place and effective. Directors, Senior Managers and Health & Safety Managers will want to ensure the following are being considered:
Check business continuity plans;
Check the effectiveness of existing fire precautions;
Check staff are fully aware of fire and evacuation procedures;
Take appropriate steps to enhance staff vigilance;
Review arrangements for calling the emergency services;
The need for additional staffing or patrols.
During the period of industrial action it should be noted that we may not be able to respond to any fire safety enquiries within our normal time-scales. I would, however, highlight the fact that it remains the responsibility of employers and other premises occupiers to comply with fire safety law; information on how to achieve this, and more general fire safety advice, is available on our website at:
www.london-fire.gov.uk
I apologise for any inconvenience this temporary disruption may cause and can assure you that we will be taking all necessary action to minimise its effects.
Yours faithfully,
STEVE TUREK
Assistant Commissioner
Fire Safety Regulation
Tuesday 19 October 2010
RRO Breach :
Liverpool launderette owner ordered to pay £9,000 over fire safety breaches
Liverpool Echo 19th October 2010
A LAUNDERETTE owner has been ordered to pay £9,000 after failing to comply with fire safety laws.
Christine Doyle, who owns Wash and Press Centre on Aigburth Road, had no fire prevention or detection measures when she was visited by fire safety inspectors.
The launderette was issued with a stop notice and closed after the visit last November, but she continued to trade.
Liverpool Echo 19th October 2010
A LAUNDERETTE owner has been ordered to pay £9,000 after failing to comply with fire safety laws.
Christine Doyle, who owns Wash and Press Centre on Aigburth Road, had no fire prevention or detection measures when she was visited by fire safety inspectors.
The launderette was issued with a stop notice and closed after the visit last November, but she continued to trade.
Friday 8 October 2010
RRO breaches: Indian restaurant bosses fined £8,000 for 'horrific' safety failings
Ignorance of the RRO is no excuse.
TWO bosses at a well-known Indian restaurant have each been fined £4,000 for breaching fire regulations after a blaze at the premises.
Plymouth magistrates told Taklus Hussain and Faizul Hoque they were ‘horrified’ at safety breaches at Mutley Spice.
They heard that smoke alarms at Mutley Spice were inadequate and stairwells leading to flats above were blocked.
The court was told that the fire was only spotted when a passer-by saw smoke.
Presiding magistrate Diana Greene said: “We were horrified at the extent of your non-compliance. If a random passer-by had not seen the smoke the outcome could have been extremely different. It hardly bears thinking about.”
Magistrates fined them both a total of £4,000 and ordered that they pay £2,300 each in prosecution costs.
Part of the basement restaurant was seriously damaged but nobody was hurt in the fire last November.
Hussain, aged 57, and Hoque, aged 48, admitted four breaches of fire regulations which put people at risk of death or serious injury on or before November 23 last year.
Hussain and Hoque, both of Mutley, admitted not carrying out a proper fire risk assessment and not giving staff proper training.
They also admitted not having suitable detectors and alarms and not keeping exits clear from the domestic premises at the three-storey building.
Kingsley Keat, prosecuting for the Devon and Fire Rescue Authority, said that a fire started when a member of staff left a heater on at about 5pm on November 23.
He added that the risk was not to any customers who may have been in the restaurant but to members of staff who stayed in the flats above the restaurant in Mutley Plain.
The court heard that the fire brigade were called by a passer-by.
Mr Keat said that the stairwells to the upper floors were cluttered with boxes, pots and other items.
He added that the building was not fitted with adequate commercial standard smoke detectors and fire alarms.
Anthony Dyke, for both men, said that the offences happened through ignorance and were not a deliberate breach of the law.
He added that the restaurant itself was largely compliant with fire regulations but the mistake the directors made was allowing staff to stay overnight in the accommodation upstairs.
TWO bosses at a well-known Indian restaurant have each been fined £4,000 for breaching fire regulations after a blaze at the premises.
Plymouth magistrates told Taklus Hussain and Faizul Hoque they were ‘horrified’ at safety breaches at Mutley Spice.
They heard that smoke alarms at Mutley Spice were inadequate and stairwells leading to flats above were blocked.
The court was told that the fire was only spotted when a passer-by saw smoke.
Presiding magistrate Diana Greene said: “We were horrified at the extent of your non-compliance. If a random passer-by had not seen the smoke the outcome could have been extremely different. It hardly bears thinking about.”
Magistrates fined them both a total of £4,000 and ordered that they pay £2,300 each in prosecution costs.
Part of the basement restaurant was seriously damaged but nobody was hurt in the fire last November.
Hussain, aged 57, and Hoque, aged 48, admitted four breaches of fire regulations which put people at risk of death or serious injury on or before November 23 last year.
Hussain and Hoque, both of Mutley, admitted not carrying out a proper fire risk assessment and not giving staff proper training.
They also admitted not having suitable detectors and alarms and not keeping exits clear from the domestic premises at the three-storey building.
Kingsley Keat, prosecuting for the Devon and Fire Rescue Authority, said that a fire started when a member of staff left a heater on at about 5pm on November 23.
He added that the risk was not to any customers who may have been in the restaurant but to members of staff who stayed in the flats above the restaurant in Mutley Plain.
The court heard that the fire brigade were called by a passer-by.
Mr Keat said that the stairwells to the upper floors were cluttered with boxes, pots and other items.
He added that the building was not fitted with adequate commercial standard smoke detectors and fire alarms.
Anthony Dyke, for both men, said that the offences happened through ignorance and were not a deliberate breach of the law.
He added that the restaurant itself was largely compliant with fire regulations but the mistake the directors made was allowing staff to stay overnight in the accommodation upstairs.
Thursday 7 October 2010
RRO Breaches: Cheshire Hotel Fined £75,000
Hoteliers are being warned to check fire safety equipment and procedures at their premises after The Belfry Hotel in Cheshire was fined £75k for breaching fire safety codes.
A routine visit (in April 2008) by the fire service to the 160-bedroom Hallmark Hotel revealed such severe safety issues that Fire Safety Officers closed the hotel immediately.
They found numerous faulty smoke detectors and substandard fire exits, while the hotel’s third floor failed to contain a single working fire alarm. Staff were also found to have not been properly trained in fire safety.
Lee Shears, manager for Community Fire Protection at Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service, said: “Fire safety is a key part of good business management and the Hallmark Hotel Group showed little or no regard for the safety of their guests or employees and the result was a prosecution.”
The Belfry Hotel pleaded guilty to three counts of serious breaches of the regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order at Chester Crown Court on Monday (4 October), paying £25k for each offence and £53k in costs.
Judge Elgin Edwards told the court that the legislation is there to ensure the protection of the public.
“For people who run hotels, fire security is particularly important,” he said. “This company carried on trading and taking guests when quite clearly these guests were put at substantial risk.”
The Belfry Hotel was given permission to reopen four days later after fixing fire safety problems and installing the required equipment.
IFEDA comment: If anyone is unsure of their responsibilities with regards to the Regulatory Reform Fire Safety Order IFEDA members are only to happy to help and advise especially with regards to Fire Risk Assessments BUT as the above case shows just don't ignore the problem, your local authorities will close buildings and prosecute when they deem it necessary. http://www.ifeda.org/regions.htm
A routine visit (in April 2008) by the fire service to the 160-bedroom Hallmark Hotel revealed such severe safety issues that Fire Safety Officers closed the hotel immediately.
They found numerous faulty smoke detectors and substandard fire exits, while the hotel’s third floor failed to contain a single working fire alarm. Staff were also found to have not been properly trained in fire safety.
Lee Shears, manager for Community Fire Protection at Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service, said: “Fire safety is a key part of good business management and the Hallmark Hotel Group showed little or no regard for the safety of their guests or employees and the result was a prosecution.”
The Belfry Hotel pleaded guilty to three counts of serious breaches of the regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order at Chester Crown Court on Monday (4 October), paying £25k for each offence and £53k in costs.
Judge Elgin Edwards told the court that the legislation is there to ensure the protection of the public.
“For people who run hotels, fire security is particularly important,” he said. “This company carried on trading and taking guests when quite clearly these guests were put at substantial risk.”
The Belfry Hotel was given permission to reopen four days later after fixing fire safety problems and installing the required equipment.
IFEDA comment: If anyone is unsure of their responsibilities with regards to the Regulatory Reform Fire Safety Order IFEDA members are only to happy to help and advise especially with regards to Fire Risk Assessments BUT as the above case shows just don't ignore the problem, your local authorities will close buildings and prosecute when they deem it necessary. http://www.ifeda.org/regions.htm
The dangers of candles
A HOUSE blaze, where a mother and her young son narrowly escaped injury, has prompted fire chiefs to issue a warning about the dangers of candles. Cleveland Fire Brigade crews were called to Hastings Way in Billingham last Friday night (1st ) after a candle is thought to have set fire to curtains in a living room. The occupants, a mother and her two-year-old son, both attended hospital for checks after the incident but were later released. Ian Harrington, District Manager for Stockton, said the incident highlighted the dangers of naked flames in the home and called for people to be extra careful. He said: “Candles can be a very quick way of seriously putting your life in danger if you don’t pay attention. Never leave them unattended. On this occasion this family was very lucky but on another occasion they might not have been so fortunate.”
Friday 1 October 2010
Press release October 2010
IFEDA set the standards
As champions for standards within the fire industry, the fire association IFEDA have passed their ISO 9001: 2008 inspection. Adherence to ISO is a public commitment to IFEDA’s belief in quality standards, enabling it to provide the best service to members. As an independent audit, ISO demonstrates that IFEDA are achieving their goals.
Graham Ferris, General Manager says: “Passing this inspection demonstrates that as a trade association IFEDA are practising what we ask members to commit to. It is 3rd party recognition of the continuing standards we strive for in the industry.”
As an independent trade association that champions quality and service within the fire industry, IFEDA ask members to demonstrate their commitment to raising standards by passing ISO 9001: 2008 themselves. For members that fail to work towards this standard, membership is terminated. Eight members have had their membership terminated this year for failing to fulfil this commitment.
Graham Ferris continues “It’s unfortunate that a small proportion of memberships have been terminated, however when all members commit to raising standards within the industry and work hard towards this, non-compliance reflects badly on everyone.”
Details on the benefits of IFEDA membership can be found at: www.ifeda.org.
As champions for standards within the fire industry, the fire association IFEDA have passed their ISO 9001: 2008 inspection. Adherence to ISO is a public commitment to IFEDA’s belief in quality standards, enabling it to provide the best service to members. As an independent audit, ISO demonstrates that IFEDA are achieving their goals.
Graham Ferris, General Manager says: “Passing this inspection demonstrates that as a trade association IFEDA are practising what we ask members to commit to. It is 3rd party recognition of the continuing standards we strive for in the industry.”
As an independent trade association that champions quality and service within the fire industry, IFEDA ask members to demonstrate their commitment to raising standards by passing ISO 9001: 2008 themselves. For members that fail to work towards this standard, membership is terminated. Eight members have had their membership terminated this year for failing to fulfil this commitment.
Graham Ferris continues “It’s unfortunate that a small proportion of memberships have been terminated, however when all members commit to raising standards within the industry and work hard towards this, non-compliance reflects badly on everyone.”
Details on the benefits of IFEDA membership can be found at: www.ifeda.org.
Tuesday 28 September 2010
Firetalk - latest edition
Hi, the latest edition of the IFEDA newsletter 'Firetalk' can be found via this link http://www.ifeda.org/newsletter.htm
Happy reading
Happy reading
IFEDA on Twitter
good morning, if you were following IFEDA on twitter you will need to sign up again as I had to redo the page - thanks
Friday 24 September 2010
RRO breaches : Latest case. £33,000 worth of fines.
Hotel 'put profit before safety'
Source Juliet Eysenck on Sep 24, Westminster Chronicle
A Paddington hotel accused of putting profit before safety has been fined for breaching fire regulations.
Two members of the public raised concerns after staying overnight at the Ventures Hotel in Sussex Gardens.
Fire officers then inspected the property and found a number of fire safety failings including blocked emergency exits, wedged open fire doors and no suitable or sufficient fire risk assessment.
They issued an enforcement notice detailing the issues and set a time frame for them to be remedied by.
Malik Mohammed Bashir, manager of Ventures Hotel in Sussex Gardens, and Awan Investments Ltd, which owns the hotel, denied 10 fire safety offences but were found guilty at Westminster Magistrates' Court on September 14.
District judge Michael Snow said the defendants were not concerned with the safety of staff and guests, and that the fire safety lapses showed the organisation prioritised profit over safety.
Speaking after the hearing, Mr Bashir said: "This was an isolated incident and it happened so long ago.
"All the issues are resolved now.
"We had some redecoration work going on at the time, and if people are delivering materials, it's very difficult to stop them parking in front of the hotel and blocking emergency exits.
"One part of the hotel was closed at the time."
Awan Investments Ltd was ordered to pay £27,015 in fines and costs, while Mr Bashir was fined a further £5,015 for his role in the safety breaches on March 2, 2009.
Steve Turek, London Fire Brigade's assistant commissioner for fire safety regulation, said: "The general public should feel safe from fire when they are staying at a hotel and the responsible person must make sure their premises comply with the regulations.
"All premises owners and operators must undertake a fire safety risk assessment."
Source Juliet Eysenck on Sep 24, Westminster Chronicle
A Paddington hotel accused of putting profit before safety has been fined for breaching fire regulations.
Two members of the public raised concerns after staying overnight at the Ventures Hotel in Sussex Gardens.
Fire officers then inspected the property and found a number of fire safety failings including blocked emergency exits, wedged open fire doors and no suitable or sufficient fire risk assessment.
They issued an enforcement notice detailing the issues and set a time frame for them to be remedied by.
Malik Mohammed Bashir, manager of Ventures Hotel in Sussex Gardens, and Awan Investments Ltd, which owns the hotel, denied 10 fire safety offences but were found guilty at Westminster Magistrates' Court on September 14.
District judge Michael Snow said the defendants were not concerned with the safety of staff and guests, and that the fire safety lapses showed the organisation prioritised profit over safety.
Speaking after the hearing, Mr Bashir said: "This was an isolated incident and it happened so long ago.
"All the issues are resolved now.
"We had some redecoration work going on at the time, and if people are delivering materials, it's very difficult to stop them parking in front of the hotel and blocking emergency exits.
"One part of the hotel was closed at the time."
Awan Investments Ltd was ordered to pay £27,015 in fines and costs, while Mr Bashir was fined a further £5,015 for his role in the safety breaches on March 2, 2009.
Steve Turek, London Fire Brigade's assistant commissioner for fire safety regulation, said: "The general public should feel safe from fire when they are staying at a hotel and the responsible person must make sure their premises comply with the regulations.
"All premises owners and operators must undertake a fire safety risk assessment."
Thursday 2 September 2010
Chubb Fire Wins Appeal
If Chubb had lost the appeal detailed below the implications for every supplier of fire extinguishers could have been serious: a good day for all.
Court of Appeal: Chubb Fire wins appeal Re £240,000 extinguisher damage
In a landmark case, the Court of Appeal has held that a fire safety company was not responsible for the damage caused by vandals setting off a dry powder extinguisher, causing £240,000 worth of damage to a historic Lincolnshire church.
On Friday 1 September 2006, three teenage boys entered the unlocked and unoccupied medieval church of St Mary and St Nicholas in Spalding. The boys found a dry powder extinguisher in a small kitchen took it into the main part of the church and discharged it along the length of the nave, covering the fabric/furniture of the church and many expensive fittings.
In the original hearing at Nottingham County Court in January 2009, the judge found that Chubb Fire was liable for the damage, as it negligently failed to warn the church about the mess that a discharge would cause.
In a judgement delivered on 20 August, the Court of Appeal reversed the judge’s decision, saying that it even if a warning had been given by Chubb, there was no evidence that the church would have made a definite decision not to install the dry powder extinguisher. The court also held that it was not fair to hold Chubb liable for the deliberate and criminal actions of people over whom it had no responsibility, even if malicious discharge of an extinguisher was in some way foreseeable.
The church's insurers, Ecclesiastical Insurance, had brought the original claim in the name of the church.
Have a good day.
Court of Appeal: Chubb Fire wins appeal Re £240,000 extinguisher damage
In a landmark case, the Court of Appeal has held that a fire safety company was not responsible for the damage caused by vandals setting off a dry powder extinguisher, causing £240,000 worth of damage to a historic Lincolnshire church.
On Friday 1 September 2006, three teenage boys entered the unlocked and unoccupied medieval church of St Mary and St Nicholas in Spalding. The boys found a dry powder extinguisher in a small kitchen took it into the main part of the church and discharged it along the length of the nave, covering the fabric/furniture of the church and many expensive fittings.
In the original hearing at Nottingham County Court in January 2009, the judge found that Chubb Fire was liable for the damage, as it negligently failed to warn the church about the mess that a discharge would cause.
In a judgement delivered on 20 August, the Court of Appeal reversed the judge’s decision, saying that it even if a warning had been given by Chubb, there was no evidence that the church would have made a definite decision not to install the dry powder extinguisher. The court also held that it was not fair to hold Chubb liable for the deliberate and criminal actions of people over whom it had no responsibility, even if malicious discharge of an extinguisher was in some way foreseeable.
The church's insurers, Ecclesiastical Insurance, had brought the original claim in the name of the church.
Have a good day.
Thursday 29 July 2010
Another timely warning: Beware Asbestos
The following article relates directly to technicians of fire protection companies who work in schools and have to disturb the fabric of the building to lay cables, fit extinguisher brackets etc.
Remember: you should be asking to see the Asbestos Register when you first sign in to a premises (IFEDA fire extinguisher training manual).
Repeal of schools-building programme raises asbestos alarm
The cancellation of the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) Programme could increase the risk of children, teachers and support staff being exposed to asbestos, TUC union officials have warned.
Many existing school buildings are likely to contain asbestos, as they were built before 1970, when the material was in common use. As these buildings fall into disrepair, the risk of asbestos exposure increases significantly.
The number of teachers who have died from the asbestos-related cancer mesothelioma has increased by more than 300 per cent in the last 20 years, according to the TUC campaigners. More worryingly, they point out that children exposed to asbestos are five times more likely to develop mesothelioma than adult teachers in the same environment.
The TUC Asbestos Support and Campaign Group is further alarmed by the fact that many schools have spent little on maintenance, on the promise that they would be part of the previous Labour government’s BSF programme, which aimed to rebuild or renew nearly every secondary school in England. The Group claims that new Education secretary Michael Gove’s decision to halt the BSF scheme has scuppered the plans of nearly 100 schools in the north of England (six in Cumbria and 93 in the North East) to move forward with a new-build programme.
20 tradesmen/women die every week from the effects of asbestos - don't let it be you.
Remember: you should be asking to see the Asbestos Register when you first sign in to a premises (IFEDA fire extinguisher training manual).
Repeal of schools-building programme raises asbestos alarm
The cancellation of the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) Programme could increase the risk of children, teachers and support staff being exposed to asbestos, TUC union officials have warned.
Many existing school buildings are likely to contain asbestos, as they were built before 1970, when the material was in common use. As these buildings fall into disrepair, the risk of asbestos exposure increases significantly.
The number of teachers who have died from the asbestos-related cancer mesothelioma has increased by more than 300 per cent in the last 20 years, according to the TUC campaigners. More worryingly, they point out that children exposed to asbestos are five times more likely to develop mesothelioma than adult teachers in the same environment.
The TUC Asbestos Support and Campaign Group is further alarmed by the fact that many schools have spent little on maintenance, on the promise that they would be part of the previous Labour government’s BSF programme, which aimed to rebuild or renew nearly every secondary school in England. The Group claims that new Education secretary Michael Gove’s decision to halt the BSF scheme has scuppered the plans of nearly 100 schools in the north of England (six in Cumbria and 93 in the North East) to move forward with a new-build programme.
20 tradesmen/women die every week from the effects of asbestos - don't let it be you.
Thursday 8 July 2010
Why Join IFEDA
So why would you join a trade association like IFEDA? Well there are plenty of reasons which are listed in various places but one over-riding reason more than anything would be SUPPORT:- on Monday lunchtime IFEDA was informed of a potential problem and safety alert regarding a certain type/batch of fire extinguisher valve heads: this alert was with members within the hour. So not having to scrabble around in various forums or rely on hearsay to find out what's going on: if we know it, the members know it.
Convinced? See www.ifeda.org/join.htm
Convinced? See www.ifeda.org/join.htm
IFEDA Newsletter
The summer edition of Firetalk, the quarterly newsletter from IFEDA, is available to view at www.ifeda.org/newsletter.htm
Refresher Course Updates
Please be advised that there are places available on the following Extinguisher refresher courses:-
Blackwood, Gwent - Tuesday 21st Sept,
Walsall, West Midlands - Tuesday, 14th Sept
Enfield, North London - Wednesday, 18th August
BS5306-3 Annex A (informative) recommends the competent person; having passed the described examination should attend a refresher course at least every three years.
BAFE are with-holding SP101/ST104 certificates and badges if refreshers are not up to date.
These IFEDA courses are BAFE recognised and are run as per BS5306-3: 2009.
The syllabus can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Should you wish to book please reply direct to me in the first instance by email.
Blackwood, Gwent - Tuesday 21st Sept,
Walsall, West Midlands - Tuesday, 14th Sept
Enfield, North London - Wednesday, 18th August
BS5306-3 Annex A (informative) recommends the competent person; having passed the described examination should attend a refresher course at least every three years.
BAFE are with-holding SP101/ST104 certificates and badges if refreshers are not up to date.
These IFEDA courses are BAFE recognised and are run as per BS5306-3: 2009.
The syllabus can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Should you wish to book please reply direct to me in the first instance by email.
Thursday 17 June 2010
Judge Upholds New Look Fine
Court of Appeal upholds £400,000 fine for New Look
16 June 2010
Retailer New Look’s appeal against its record £400,000 fine for fire safety breaches at its Oxford Street store was dismissed yesterday, with the Court of Appeal saying the fine was not excessive in view of the company’s “lamentable” performance of fire safety duties.In a significant judgement for responsible persons under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the court decided that the level of the fine was not excessive in relation to the seriousness of the offences, the size and nature of the company, and the risk to the public which New Look ran. The court also held that the fine was not out of kilter with those for offences under general health and safety legislation where there was a risk of death or serious injury. The conviction of New Look last November followed a fire at its Oxford Street store on 26 April 2009, which resulted in a chaotic evacuation of some 400 people, the closure part of Oxford Street for two days, and the eventual demolition of the building. The company was subsequently prosecuted and pleaded guilty to two main counts under the Fire Safety Order – failing to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, and failing to ensure that employees were given adequate fire safety training. Other alleged detailed breaches were taken into account under these two counts. The Court of Appeal concluded that while it accepted that the fire itself was not caused by the retailer’s breaches of duty, (the cause of the fire has never been established) the offences were serious enough to create a magnitude of risk in which death and serious injury in the fire was avoided by luck. The appeal judges also agreed with the trial judge that a starting point for a fine in these circumstances was £600,000. This was rightly reduced to £400,000 in view of nobody being killed or injured, the company pleading guilty and co-operating with the investigation at the earliest opportunity, and the company demonstrating that it had taken significant steps to remedy fire safety shortcomings across its stores.Special risks from fireWhile maintaining that the principles of setting the level of fines under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 were similar to those for the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the court said the trial judge was right to recognise “that the nature of the risk that employees and others were to be protected was the risk from death or serious injury in a fire. Fire can be indiscriminate in its effect and, in the case of an organisation which in the centre of a large city undertakes responsibility for large numbers of visitors to its premises, breach will usually be a very serious matter.”The Court of Appeal concluded: “We share the judge’s view that the appellant’s performance of its fire safety duties in a large department store in the centre of London was lamentable. The fines were, we recognise, severe, but they were not on our judgement manifestly excessive and the appeal is dismissed.
”In a statement issued after the judgement, the retailer said:"New Look is committed to putting the health and safety of customers and employees first. Although the appeal against the fine was unsuccessful, we note that the original 35 alleged breaches of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (RRFSO) were reduced to 2 offences and at no time has it been alleged that the company was either responsible for the fire, or that its breaches of the RRFSO caused the fire."
16 June 2010
Retailer New Look’s appeal against its record £400,000 fine for fire safety breaches at its Oxford Street store was dismissed yesterday, with the Court of Appeal saying the fine was not excessive in view of the company’s “lamentable” performance of fire safety duties.In a significant judgement for responsible persons under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the court decided that the level of the fine was not excessive in relation to the seriousness of the offences, the size and nature of the company, and the risk to the public which New Look ran. The court also held that the fine was not out of kilter with those for offences under general health and safety legislation where there was a risk of death or serious injury. The conviction of New Look last November followed a fire at its Oxford Street store on 26 April 2009, which resulted in a chaotic evacuation of some 400 people, the closure part of Oxford Street for two days, and the eventual demolition of the building. The company was subsequently prosecuted and pleaded guilty to two main counts under the Fire Safety Order – failing to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, and failing to ensure that employees were given adequate fire safety training. Other alleged detailed breaches were taken into account under these two counts. The Court of Appeal concluded that while it accepted that the fire itself was not caused by the retailer’s breaches of duty, (the cause of the fire has never been established) the offences were serious enough to create a magnitude of risk in which death and serious injury in the fire was avoided by luck. The appeal judges also agreed with the trial judge that a starting point for a fine in these circumstances was £600,000. This was rightly reduced to £400,000 in view of nobody being killed or injured, the company pleading guilty and co-operating with the investigation at the earliest opportunity, and the company demonstrating that it had taken significant steps to remedy fire safety shortcomings across its stores.Special risks from fireWhile maintaining that the principles of setting the level of fines under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 were similar to those for the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the court said the trial judge was right to recognise “that the nature of the risk that employees and others were to be protected was the risk from death or serious injury in a fire. Fire can be indiscriminate in its effect and, in the case of an organisation which in the centre of a large city undertakes responsibility for large numbers of visitors to its premises, breach will usually be a very serious matter.”The Court of Appeal concluded: “We share the judge’s view that the appellant’s performance of its fire safety duties in a large department store in the centre of London was lamentable. The fines were, we recognise, severe, but they were not on our judgement manifestly excessive and the appeal is dismissed.
”In a statement issued after the judgement, the retailer said:"New Look is committed to putting the health and safety of customers and employees first. Although the appeal against the fine was unsuccessful, we note that the original 35 alleged breaches of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (RRFSO) were reduced to 2 offences and at no time has it been alleged that the company was either responsible for the fire, or that its breaches of the RRFSO caused the fire."
Thursday 10 June 2010
RRO Fire Breaches at the CLG
The condemnation of the CLG at Eland House for failures relating to the Regulatory Reform Fire Safety Order 2005 (RRO) is both timely and pertinent in that it highlights another failure of the previous administration i.e. it introduced major legislation in the form of the RRO without the necessary fanfare and education it deserved. When even the CLG, the department responsible for implementation of the RRO doesn't understand its own responsibilities (and clearly doesn't understand what a fire risk assessment is and how to do one) what chance has the rest of UKPLC got - the majority of which is not free from prosecution. Compare this non-campaign for the RRO to the yearly Asbestos Awareness campaign and even the presently running campaign to remind people to renew their tax credits. Ignorance may be bliss but as we know Fire costs lives.
Thursday 3 June 2010
IFEDA Extinguisher Refresher Courses
please be advised that there are places available on the following Extinguisher refresher courses:-
Enfield, North London - Wednesday, 18th August (date TBC)
Wymondham, Norfolk Tuesday, 13th July
Glasgow Tuesday, 15th June
BS5306-3 Annex A (informative) recommends the competent person; having passed the described examination should attend a refresher course at least every three years.
I have just been informed that BAFE are with-holding SP101/ST104 certificates and badges if refreshers are not up to date.
These IFEDA courses are BAFE recognised and are run as per BS5306-3: 2009.
The syllabus can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Should you wish to book please reply direct to me in the first instance by email.
Enfield, North London - Wednesday, 18th August (date TBC)
Wymondham, Norfolk Tuesday, 13th July
Glasgow Tuesday, 15th June
BS5306-3 Annex A (informative) recommends the competent person; having passed the described examination should attend a refresher course at least every three years.
I have just been informed that BAFE are with-holding SP101/ST104 certificates and badges if refreshers are not up to date.
These IFEDA courses are BAFE recognised and are run as per BS5306-3: 2009.
The syllabus can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Should you wish to book please reply direct to me in the first instance by email.
Friday 21 May 2010
New IFEDA Facebook group
Welcome to the IFEDA - Coffee Lounge. We have set up a group for all the administration support left alone and behind at the office (the power behind the throne that actually keeps the business on the road) whilst the extinguishers, alarms and suppression systems are being seen to in the big wide world. Who can you turn to if you have any query you're not sure about e.g. I'm using excel/outlook/word etc etc what do i do if/when? If so why not post it in the coffee lounge and you never know someone else maybe having the same problem or have just worked it out.
The IFEDA - Coffee Lounge http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=114835081891371
See you there - mine's black with one sugar and if you insist a digestive too.
The IFEDA - Coffee Lounge http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=114835081891371
See you there - mine's black with one sugar and if you insist a digestive too.
Wednesday 28 April 2010
Fire Hose Reel Courses - Stockport
Due to extra demand there will be two more fire hose reel courses (run to BS671-3 : 2009) in Stockport on the following dates:-
Friday 21st May and Friday 25th June.
The syllabus and other details for this course can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Please contact info@ifeda.org should you wish to book of for more information.
The cost of the course includes; comprehensive training manual, certificate and refreshments.
Friday 21st May and Friday 25th June.
The syllabus and other details for this course can be found at www.ifeda.org/training.htm
Please contact info@ifeda.org should you wish to book of for more information.
The cost of the course includes; comprehensive training manual, certificate and refreshments.
Monday 1 March 2010
Extinguisher Refresher Course - Glasgow
There will be a one day extinguisher refresher course in Glasgow on Tuesday 15th June.
This will include notes from the recent IFEDA workshops highlighting the changes to BS5306-3: 2009
The cost of this course will be IFEDA members £140 + vat
Non- IFEDA members £160 + vat
Please note the IFEDA extinguisher training courses are recognised by BAFE as per BS5306-3 : 2009 annex A. The cost of the course includes; comprehensive training manual, certificate and refreshments.
To check any details re the syllabus please see www.ifeda.org/training.htm
If you are interested in this course, in the first instance, please reply by email to grahamferris@ifeda.org
This will include notes from the recent IFEDA workshops highlighting the changes to BS5306-3: 2009
The cost of this course will be IFEDA members £140 + vat
Non- IFEDA members £160 + vat
Please note the IFEDA extinguisher training courses are recognised by BAFE as per BS5306-3 : 2009 annex A. The cost of the course includes; comprehensive training manual, certificate and refreshments.
To check any details re the syllabus please see www.ifeda.org/training.htm
If you are interested in this course, in the first instance, please reply by email to grahamferris@ifeda.org
Friday 26 February 2010
New Training Facilities Scotland & Midlands
Training facilities Scotland
With our members in Scotland and the far North of England in mind we are delighted to announce that thanks to the good offices of Rapid Fire Services Ltd of Glasgow, IFEDA now has dedicated training facilities North of the Border. To begin with we will run extinguisher refresher courses adding at later dates the initial (3 day) extinguisher technician training courses.
Training facilities Midlands
Later this year IFEDA will also begin refresher training at Spectrum Fire Protection Ltd, Walsall, with special thanks to Paul Kerman. Adding this location means our Midlands based members will no longer have to trek North to Stockport or South to Fareham.
Both of our new locations are situated near to major routes/motorways·
N.B. IFEDA extinguisher courses are BAFE recognised as per SP101/ST104
With our members in Scotland and the far North of England in mind we are delighted to announce that thanks to the good offices of Rapid Fire Services Ltd of Glasgow, IFEDA now has dedicated training facilities North of the Border. To begin with we will run extinguisher refresher courses adding at later dates the initial (3 day) extinguisher technician training courses.
Training facilities Midlands
Later this year IFEDA will also begin refresher training at Spectrum Fire Protection Ltd, Walsall, with special thanks to Paul Kerman. Adding this location means our Midlands based members will no longer have to trek North to Stockport or South to Fareham.
Both of our new locations are situated near to major routes/motorways·
N.B. IFEDA extinguisher courses are BAFE recognised as per SP101/ST104
Friday 29 January 2010
IFEDA SURVEY: FIRE RISK ASSESSMENTS
A recent IFEDA Survey of North Buckinghamshire businesses with regards to Fire Risk Assessments and the role of the Responsible Person confirmed and supported an earlier statement from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) that, rather worryingly, over 40% businesses are still failing to comply with fire regulations some three years after the introduction of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order by not carrying out Fire Risk Assessments. Introduced in October 2006 the Fire Safety Order (2005), states that all business owners are obliged to conduct regular risk assessments and maintain a fire management plan that identifies possible fire hazards and advises on safety measures. Businesses are obliged to tell their staff about the plan and train them accordingly.
Business stake holders should be aware that fire authorities are increasingly clamping down on businesses who won’t comply with the law with more than 3,000 enforcement notices issued nationwide in the past year by the fire services. This resulted in some 60 firms being prosecuted - a 40 per cent increase in just twelve months.
Further research by IFEDA revealed typical breaches of fire safety law as blocking fire exits, propping open fire doors (especially with fire extinguishers), failure to keep adequate records, failure to make a written risk assessment with more than 5 employees, failure to test fire safety equipment, failure to have their fire extinguishers serviced annually, failure to nominate a Responsible Person, inadequate signage, fire exit routes compromised with combustible items, inadequate means of escape from sleeping accommodation and a failure to train staff in evacuation procedures.
The IFEDA newsletter, FireTalk, regularly carries examples of enforcement actions and prosecutions by the Fire Service so proving that this problem is not going unnoticed and, as in the recent case of High Street store, New Look can lead to a large and potentially business breaking fine. FireTalk can be found at www.ifeda.org/newsletter.htm
Many IFEDA members offer a Fire Risk Assessment survey and can advise on all aspects of portable fire extinguishers, alarms emergency lighting and educating staff in fire prevention. A list of 3rd party accredited members in your area can be found at www.ifeda.org/regions.htm
Business stake holders should be aware that fire authorities are increasingly clamping down on businesses who won’t comply with the law with more than 3,000 enforcement notices issued nationwide in the past year by the fire services. This resulted in some 60 firms being prosecuted - a 40 per cent increase in just twelve months.
Further research by IFEDA revealed typical breaches of fire safety law as blocking fire exits, propping open fire doors (especially with fire extinguishers), failure to keep adequate records, failure to make a written risk assessment with more than 5 employees, failure to test fire safety equipment, failure to have their fire extinguishers serviced annually, failure to nominate a Responsible Person, inadequate signage, fire exit routes compromised with combustible items, inadequate means of escape from sleeping accommodation and a failure to train staff in evacuation procedures.
The IFEDA newsletter, FireTalk, regularly carries examples of enforcement actions and prosecutions by the Fire Service so proving that this problem is not going unnoticed and, as in the recent case of High Street store, New Look can lead to a large and potentially business breaking fine. FireTalk can be found at www.ifeda.org/newsletter.htm
Many IFEDA members offer a Fire Risk Assessment survey and can advise on all aspects of portable fire extinguishers, alarms emergency lighting and educating staff in fire prevention. A list of 3rd party accredited members in your area can be found at www.ifeda.org/regions.htm
Monday 18 January 2010
Extinguisher Refresher Course - Cornwall
There will be a one day (BAFE recognized) extinguisher refresher course on Thursday 13th May and also on Friday 14th May at Fire Crest, Pool in Cornwall. Please contact IFEDA for these or any of the other training courses advertised.
Please note that with today's bookings the Refresher course at Buckingham is now full.
Please note that with today's bookings the Refresher course at Buckingham is now full.
Lakanal House: “Fire risk training was 'inadequate"
Sam Masters of the South London Press reported today (Monday, 18 January) that Fire Risk Assessment Training for council staff to check for fire risks in tower blocks was inadequate for “complex” buildings, it has emerged.
Before the fatal blaze at Lakanal House in Camberwell on July 3, a change in legislation shifted responsibility from London Fire Brigade to the town halls to check buildings were safe.
Many town halls paid specialist surveyors to carry out the fire risk assessments (FRAs) on high-rises after 2006 – including Labour-run Lewisham and Lambeth councils.
But Lib Dem/Tory-run Southwark council kept the inspections in-house, sending staff on fire brigade training courses in 2008.
This week, a leaked email from Steve Turek, the London Fire Brigade’s assistant commissioner for fire safety regulation, threw the training received by council staff into doubt.
He said those on the one-day course were given “basic” knowledge of the importance and methods of risk assessments.
He said: “Our course information clearly states that the course is designed to provide participants with the knowledge and understanding to undertake FRAs in simple premises such as offices, small retail and similar premises.
“The course is not designed to equip attendees to carry out FRAs in complex structures where a clear level of expertise is required.”
The South London Press revealed last week how a town hall officer had failed to spot fire risks in a block that shared a similar layout to Lakanal House.
The FRA for Perronet House at Elephant & Castle – conducted on April 27, five weeks before the Lakanal tragedy – found only “low” and “medium” fire risks.
But a later FRA, compiled by specialists Turner & Townsend on July 17, discovered “extreme” risks and demanded a raft of safety improvements.
Councillor Ian Wingfield, Southwark Labour opposition spokesman for housing, said: “In sending out undertrained staff to carry out the vital checks to make sure our tenants and leaseholders are safe, the administration has shown a callous lack of concern for their well-being.”
A Southwark spokesman said: “These intrusive inspections [by outside contractors] go beyond what is required in a fire risk assessment.
“After the Lakanal Fire we decided to review our approach to high-rise blocks.
“We carried out, on a risk assessed basis, more detailed intrusive and technical inspections carried out by independent experts, which involve looking at the fabric of the building, under ceilings and behind walls if necessary.”
Southwark has now pledged to carry out “intrusive” checks on its 175 high-rises this year.
Before the fatal blaze at Lakanal House in Camberwell on July 3, a change in legislation shifted responsibility from London Fire Brigade to the town halls to check buildings were safe.
Many town halls paid specialist surveyors to carry out the fire risk assessments (FRAs) on high-rises after 2006 – including Labour-run Lewisham and Lambeth councils.
But Lib Dem/Tory-run Southwark council kept the inspections in-house, sending staff on fire brigade training courses in 2008.
This week, a leaked email from Steve Turek, the London Fire Brigade’s assistant commissioner for fire safety regulation, threw the training received by council staff into doubt.
He said those on the one-day course were given “basic” knowledge of the importance and methods of risk assessments.
He said: “Our course information clearly states that the course is designed to provide participants with the knowledge and understanding to undertake FRAs in simple premises such as offices, small retail and similar premises.
“The course is not designed to equip attendees to carry out FRAs in complex structures where a clear level of expertise is required.”
The South London Press revealed last week how a town hall officer had failed to spot fire risks in a block that shared a similar layout to Lakanal House.
The FRA for Perronet House at Elephant & Castle – conducted on April 27, five weeks before the Lakanal tragedy – found only “low” and “medium” fire risks.
But a later FRA, compiled by specialists Turner & Townsend on July 17, discovered “extreme” risks and demanded a raft of safety improvements.
Councillor Ian Wingfield, Southwark Labour opposition spokesman for housing, said: “In sending out undertrained staff to carry out the vital checks to make sure our tenants and leaseholders are safe, the administration has shown a callous lack of concern for their well-being.”
A Southwark spokesman said: “These intrusive inspections [by outside contractors] go beyond what is required in a fire risk assessment.
“After the Lakanal Fire we decided to review our approach to high-rise blocks.
“We carried out, on a risk assessed basis, more detailed intrusive and technical inspections carried out by independent experts, which involve looking at the fabric of the building, under ceilings and behind walls if necessary.”
Southwark has now pledged to carry out “intrusive” checks on its 175 high-rises this year.
Wednesday 13 January 2010
Stop Press - Extra Extinguisher Refresher Course - Buckingham
There will be a extinguisher refresher course (open to members and non-members alike) on Thursday 28th Jan at the Buckingham Hotel, Buckingham, North Bucks. Details can be found in the usual places or please contact me direct for details via grahamferris@ifeda.org
Tuesday 12 January 2010
Extinguisher Refresher Course North of England
Extra refresher course: As Stockport in April is full there will be an extra one day (BAFE approved) extinguisher refresher course at HE Woolley in Middlesbrough on Tuesday 27th April.
Friday 8 January 2010
Lakanal House and Fire Risk assessments
The following takes about 25 minutes to listen to - it is well worth it. Shocking really!
For anyone who may be interested that missed the radio 4 article today (Thursday 7th Jan) on fire risk assessments in high rise tower blocks, here is the link;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00pky9h/Face_the_Facts_High_Rise_Low_Safety/
Regards to all,
For anyone who may be interested that missed the radio 4 article today (Thursday 7th Jan) on fire risk assessments in high rise tower blocks, here is the link;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00pky9h/Face_the_Facts_High_Rise_Low_Safety/
Regards to all,
Help for New and Non members
IFEDA’s New Member Assistance Programme
If your company is involved in the supply of fire protection equipment and specifically the commissioning and maintenance of Portable Fire Extinguishers and you would like the support and guidance of a Trade Association which is specifically for the independently owned business, then ask yourself:-
· Would you like to be a member of an independent Trade Association i.e. IFEDA where every member is equal, based on the democratic principle of one member one vote. An Association, whose total objectives are to help, assist and fight for the interests of independently owned businesses – just like yours?
· Are you looking at the quality route to take your business forward in 2010 with ISO/BAFE SP101 accreditation?
· Do you know where to start?
If your answer to the first two questions YES and you scratch your head at the third then IFEDA can help.
Following updates and modifications to our long established Member Assistance Programme we are delighted to announce the launch of IFEDA’s Quality Assistance Scheme (QAS). This scheme is designed to help companies obtain ISO/BAFE accreditation whilst also being part of IFEDA and receiving all the guidance and support that belonging to a nationally recognised trade association brings.
By signing up to QAS you will receive:
· A personal visit from the IFEDA General Manager to set you on the right road.
· All documentation pertaining to your business and ISO 9001: 2008 (written with BAFE SP101 in mind).
· Full membership of IFEDA for 12 months
· Help & Assistance in achieving full BAFE approval to SP101/ST104.
· Professional help in developing a quality policy manual which relates to the company's business operations
· An audit to certify your company to ISO 9001 by a UKAS accredited certification body.
The main benefits of this scheme are that:
· You take less time out of your business setting up the documentation etc
· You get personal one to one help.
· The cost to your company is greatly reduced (e.g. the membership element may be paid for over 10 months by direct debit)
· There will be a much faster timescale for completion than if you arranged it yourself.
If you are interested please contact Graham Ferris, General Manager
on 02380 513326 or via email to grahamferris@ifeda.org
IFEDA: The Trade Association where your voice is heard and your interests are ours
If your company is involved in the supply of fire protection equipment and specifically the commissioning and maintenance of Portable Fire Extinguishers and you would like the support and guidance of a Trade Association which is specifically for the independently owned business, then ask yourself:-
· Would you like to be a member of an independent Trade Association i.e. IFEDA where every member is equal, based on the democratic principle of one member one vote. An Association, whose total objectives are to help, assist and fight for the interests of independently owned businesses – just like yours?
· Are you looking at the quality route to take your business forward in 2010 with ISO/BAFE SP101 accreditation?
· Do you know where to start?
If your answer to the first two questions YES and you scratch your head at the third then IFEDA can help.
Following updates and modifications to our long established Member Assistance Programme we are delighted to announce the launch of IFEDA’s Quality Assistance Scheme (QAS). This scheme is designed to help companies obtain ISO/BAFE accreditation whilst also being part of IFEDA and receiving all the guidance and support that belonging to a nationally recognised trade association brings.
By signing up to QAS you will receive:
· A personal visit from the IFEDA General Manager to set you on the right road.
· All documentation pertaining to your business and ISO 9001: 2008 (written with BAFE SP101 in mind).
· Full membership of IFEDA for 12 months
· Help & Assistance in achieving full BAFE approval to SP101/ST104.
· Professional help in developing a quality policy manual which relates to the company's business operations
· An audit to certify your company to ISO 9001 by a UKAS accredited certification body.
The main benefits of this scheme are that:
· You take less time out of your business setting up the documentation etc
· You get personal one to one help.
· The cost to your company is greatly reduced (e.g. the membership element may be paid for over 10 months by direct debit)
· There will be a much faster timescale for completion than if you arranged it yourself.
If you are interested please contact Graham Ferris, General Manager
on 02380 513326 or via email to grahamferris@ifeda.org
IFEDA: The Trade Association where your voice is heard and your interests are ours
Wednesday 6 January 2010
Latest IFEDA Newsletter
The latest newsletter with info about up and coming training, news from the AGM and fire safety breaches can be found at www.ifeda.org
For members there is an expanded version in the members section with a members competition.
Happy reading
For members there is an expanded version in the members section with a members competition.
Happy reading
Monday 4 January 2010
Welcome New Members
We would like to extend a warm welcome to the following companies who have recently been granted full membership of IFEDA:-
· Direct Fire & Safety Ltd of St Helens, Merseyside
· The Walters Group of Milford Haven
· Guardian Security (SW) Ltd Exeter
· 3 Counties M&G Ltd of Haslemere Surrey
· Inferno Fire Safety & Security Solutions of Abertridwr, Caerphilly
· MDL Fireworks Ltd of Preston
· David Wright— Fire Protection Services of Beverley
· Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd of Greenhithe Kent
· Fal Fire Protection Ltd of Penryn, Cornwall
· The Fire Company of Plymouth
We wish them all a long and fruitful association with IFEDA and as part of IFEDA’s services to members, in the New year we will have exciting news about assistance in attaining ISO/BAFE accreditation.
Details of, and the services offered by, new and established members can be found via the IFEDA website homepage www.ifeda.org and the ‘full members’ tab.
· Direct Fire & Safety Ltd of St Helens, Merseyside
· The Walters Group of Milford Haven
· Guardian Security (SW) Ltd Exeter
· 3 Counties M&G Ltd of Haslemere Surrey
· Inferno Fire Safety & Security Solutions of Abertridwr, Caerphilly
· MDL Fireworks Ltd of Preston
· David Wright— Fire Protection Services of Beverley
· Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd of Greenhithe Kent
· Fal Fire Protection Ltd of Penryn, Cornwall
· The Fire Company of Plymouth
We wish them all a long and fruitful association with IFEDA and as part of IFEDA’s services to members, in the New year we will have exciting news about assistance in attaining ISO/BAFE accreditation.
Details of, and the services offered by, new and established members can be found via the IFEDA website homepage www.ifeda.org and the ‘full members’ tab.
IFEDA AGM 2009
The latest IFEDA National conference took place at the Charlecote Hotel near in Stratford upon Avon and attending members all agreed it was a day full of interesting and informative workshops/presentations. On the 20th anniversary of IFEDA’s inception the Chairman, Colin Payne, highlighted our many achievements over the intervening years not least in being the first fire trade association to achieve ISO 9001 and in 2004 becoming the first association to embrace BAFE approval for its members. He went on to state that in a difficult trading year membership had continued to grow and through the many different committees that Officers attended IFEDA would be, as always, at the forefront fighting for member’s interests and just as importantly campaigning to bring improvements where it can. As pioneers of the commitment to 3rd party accreditation through BAFE, IFEDA members were delighted to greet BAFE General Manager Stephen Adams and catch up with all of BAFE’s latest news and future intentions. Members also picked up some useful tips re ‘marketing on a budget’ as well as catching up with the latest Asbestos regulations and learning about an extremely useful software package for fire risk assessments, before finally taking part in an interesting discussion led by John Judd, Chairman of the IFE on the future of the fire service. For the members who were able to stay and enjoy the evening’s entertainment comedian Mickey Pugh had everyone chuckling into their dinners before the calories were bopped away until the early hours.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
